Newsletter archive - Veterinary Practitioners Registration Board of Victoria
Back MAIN MENU Next 
This article was published in the October 2024 edition of Vetboard Victoria's newsletter. Content was current at the time of publication but there may have been changes since then, as rules, standards and professional and community expectations change over time. Readers are also referred to our Guidelines for appropriate standards of veterinary practice and veterinary facilities.

Referrals to specialists

In the past year, the Board has received several complaints involving events where a veterinary practitioner performed a surgical procedure without first considering whether seeking specialist advice or referring to a specialist was appropriate in the circumstances. Some of these cases involved a tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO).

In one case, a practitioner performed a TPLO on a large breed dog despite lacking sufficient experience to handle the complexities associated with the animal’s size and condition.

It is crucial that veterinary practices foster an environment where practitioners are encouraged to recognise their limitations. While there is no formal obligation to refer a case, practitioners should carefully assess their own capabilities and what is in the best interests of the animal, and consider seeking advice from a specialist and/or suggesting to the animal owner that they see a registered specialist if the circumstances indicate it is necessary.

It is also essential that practitioners communicate to pet owners any limitations in their capabilities and associated risks, before proceeding with surgery.

By prioritising transparency, we can ensure that all animals receive the highest standard of care, ultimately benefitting patients, their owners and the veterinary practice.


Relevant guidelines